![ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets](https://www.swisco.com/images/pictures/2012/10/8698.jpg)
- #Ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets series
- #Ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets mac
- #Ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets windows
The 100MB machine is upstairs and the kids use that one. One gigabit machine is in the family room sucking media from the NAS. One gigabit machine is my personal desktop. One gigabit machine is a redhat 8 machine that is used as the network attached storage (NAS) box feeding media throughout the house and acting as the DNS for the house (This is so much faster than relying on your ISP!) and to filter packets for the kids computer (Damn Pr0N!) I have 3com gigabit cards in three computers and a 3com 100Mb card in one. I have a mixed network and have not had any problems with speed or the switches flaking out. The only references I could find are for mega-dollar Cisco/Foundry type equipment. If anyone has a success story with jumbo frames, I'd love to hear about it.
#Ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets mac
My Mac G4 in particular seems to have trouble getting good bandwidth (I think the problem is either the network stack or NFS client). I will caution you not to expect anything like gigabit wire speeds with typical clients.
#Ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets windows
This includes several Linux systems, one Mac and one Windows PC. I did a test for raw network bandwidth (just sending zero bytes as fast as possible) and got around 60-80MB/sec.Įverything is connected to my existing Cat-5 cable with no problems. NFS file copies max out at 20-30MB/sec, but I know that is limited by my server's disk array. I wouldn't skimp here since indications are that cheap gigabit cards don't have any hope of getting wire speed. Oh, and I had to disable one default feature on the hub (tree-spanning something or other) to get it to work.įor clients I use Intel gigabit cards (the 64-bit PCI "server" model). It was quite inexpensive and claims to support Jumbo Frames (however I haven't actually gotten this to work when I enlarge the frame size on Linux it loses the connection). I've had a good experience with a Dell PowerConnect hub (the 8- or 16-port model, I forget which).
![ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mfLZ1DdjhSw/maxresdefault.jpg)
It really won't help anything that doesn't already saturate the pipe (ie : VOIP, surfing the net, ping times, latency, network games, streaming DVD quality audio or video.) GigE won't make your network 10x faster in reality, but if you spend a lot of time waiting on network transfers of massive files it will make it 3x (to 8x) faster. You are right, hard drives can't move the data fast enough to take advantage of the entire pipe - but since hard drives are 3x faster than 100Mb network hardware (and the new SATA RAID setups (which I don't have (yet)) have been clocked at about 8x faster than 100Mb/s network throughput) you will see a significant increase in things that are network limited. Really doesn't make a difference on files less than 10 megs in size, but when you start moving around the nine 2G files that make up a virtual machine (VMware) so you can burn them to DVD all of a sudden you are looking at a 3x increase in throughput (my drives can read at about 35M/s, can write at about 30M/s so my throughput would be capped at 30M/s) means moving these files in 10 minutes instead of half an hour - lets say I am already looking into GigE for the house. Honest throughput on good 100Mb NICs is roughly about 10 megs a second, and from my research honest throughput on good GigaNICs is about 100 megs a second (really closer to 94M/s but still.) What this does is move the bottleneck from the network back to the hard drive. No actually this is pretty much exactly the issue at hand.
#Ezswitch 8508t mounting brackets series
I suppose you buy those cheapo $40 Linksys switches instead of a proper Cisco Catalyst 3500XL series managed 10/100 switch too right? Fucking amateurs. Now, I suppose you're saying "but all I need is a $160 8 port switch" in which case I'd say you're not a real networking geek. If you're interested in protecting your network of Windows and Linux boxes, throw in a PIX firewall blade and the IDS blade and you're rockin'. Bump up to a 4507R and get redundant supervisor IV support and 5 slots for adding in module goodies.įor those of us network geeks with serious port density needs at home, I would recommend purchasing a Catalyst 6513 w/redundant sup 720's (makes a kickass cable/DSL router w/reflexive access list support and even server load balancing of your home web servers!). 24 ports of 10/100/1000 managed switch goodness and only $4000!! That's unbelievable! Now, if you're you're looking at a modular solution with possibilities of doubling as a router then look no further than the Catalyst 4500 series. I recommend the Cisco Catalyst 3750G-24T switch for these kinds of applications. I guess that would do for amateur installations, but any serious home network engineer deploying gigabit would opt for something with a little more kick.